Review




Structured Review

Magstim Company custom designed tms filter box
(a) Location of facial markers and <t>TMS</t> targets in the neural navigator. The statistical map of voluntarily‐induced motor activity is thresholded and shown in red. Facial markers: Tip of the nose; nasion, left and right inner eyelid; left and right upper and lower ear. TMS targets: Primary motor cortex (M1); dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). (b) TMS coil probes. The probes are visualized in a T2‐weighted scan to determine their location with respect to the head. (c) Participant is lying on the MR bed with the head positioned in between two MR receive coils and the TMS coil located over the cranium [Color figure can be viewed <t>at</t> <t>http://wileyonlinelibrary.com</t> ]
Custom Designed Tms Filter Box, supplied by Magstim Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom+designed+tms+filter+box/pmc06221049-78-18-26?v=Magstim+Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom designed tms filter box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "A novel concurrent TMS‐fMRI method to reveal propagation patterns of prefrontal magnetic brain stimulation"

Article Title: A novel concurrent TMS‐fMRI method to reveal propagation patterns of prefrontal magnetic brain stimulation

Journal: Human Brain Mapping

doi: 10.1002/hbm.24307

(a) Location of facial markers and TMS targets in the neural navigator. The statistical map of voluntarily‐induced motor activity is thresholded and shown in red. Facial markers: Tip of the nose; nasion, left and right inner eyelid; left and right upper and lower ear. TMS targets: Primary motor cortex (M1); dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). (b) TMS coil probes. The probes are visualized in a T2‐weighted scan to determine their location with respect to the head. (c) Participant is lying on the MR bed with the head positioned in between two MR receive coils and the TMS coil located over the cranium [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]
Figure Legend Snippet: (a) Location of facial markers and TMS targets in the neural navigator. The statistical map of voluntarily‐induced motor activity is thresholded and shown in red. Facial markers: Tip of the nose; nasion, left and right inner eyelid; left and right upper and lower ear. TMS targets: Primary motor cortex (M1); dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). (b) TMS coil probes. The probes are visualized in a T2‐weighted scan to determine their location with respect to the head. (c) Participant is lying on the MR bed with the head positioned in between two MR receive coils and the TMS coil located over the cranium [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Techniques Used: Activity Assay

(a) Activity in the primary motor cortex in response to voluntary thumb movements (in red) and the location of the TMS coil isocenter during the TMS‐fMRI session is shown (in blue). (b) Activity in response to voluntary thumb movements contrasted with baseline activity ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (c) TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with baseline activity ( p < .05, FWE corrected). The same slices are shown as in (b) [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]
Figure Legend Snippet: (a) Activity in the primary motor cortex in response to voluntary thumb movements (in red) and the location of the TMS coil isocenter during the TMS‐fMRI session is shown (in blue). (b) Activity in response to voluntary thumb movements contrasted with baseline activity ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (c) TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with baseline activity ( p < .05, FWE corrected). The same slices are shown as in (b) [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Techniques Used: Activity Assay

(a) TMS targets projected onto individual brain surfaces. The numbers refer to the participant numbers in Table . The red dot indicates the location of the hand area in the primary motor cortex (M1) as determined through fMRI. (b) The normalized COG of each individual TMS target projected onto an MNI brain. The TMS targets are based on initial TMS coil placement (as determined through a T2‐weighted scan) and corrected for subsequent head movement during image acquisition (as determined through realignment of the EPI volumes). Corresponding colors are used in (a) and (b) and Table [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]
Figure Legend Snippet: (a) TMS targets projected onto individual brain surfaces. The numbers refer to the participant numbers in Table . The red dot indicates the location of the hand area in the primary motor cortex (M1) as determined through fMRI. (b) The normalized COG of each individual TMS target projected onto an MNI brain. The TMS targets are based on initial TMS coil placement (as determined through a T2‐weighted scan) and corrected for subsequent head movement during image acquisition (as determined through realignment of the EPI volumes). Corresponding colors are used in (a) and (b) and Table [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Techniques Used:

TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (a)–(i) show TMS‐induced activity of Participants 1, 2, and 4–10 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]
Figure Legend Snippet: TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (a)–(i) show TMS‐induced activity of Participants 1, 2, and 4–10 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Techniques Used: Activity Assay

TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (a) and (b) show TMS‐induced activity in two different participants in which the TMS target was very similar. Left is left. (a) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 9. (b) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 10 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]
Figure Legend Snippet: TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (a) and (b) show TMS‐induced activity in two different participants in which the TMS target was very similar. Left is left. (a) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 9. (b) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 10 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Techniques Used: Activity Assay

TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Sagittal slices of an MNI brain are shown (first slice = left side; last slice = right side). (a) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 5. (b) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 7. (c) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 8. (d) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 9 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]
Figure Legend Snippet: TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Sagittal slices of an MNI brain are shown (first slice = left side; last slice = right side). (a) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 5. (b) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 7. (c) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 8. (d) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 9 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Techniques Used: Activity Assay



Similar Products

90
Magstim Company custom designed tms filter box
(a) Location of facial markers and <t>TMS</t> targets in the neural navigator. The statistical map of voluntarily‐induced motor activity is thresholded and shown in red. Facial markers: Tip of the nose; nasion, left and right inner eyelid; left and right upper and lower ear. TMS targets: Primary motor cortex (M1); dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). (b) TMS coil probes. The probes are visualized in a T2‐weighted scan to determine their location with respect to the head. (c) Participant is lying on the MR bed with the head positioned in between two MR receive coils and the TMS coil located over the cranium [Color figure can be viewed <t>at</t> <t>http://wileyonlinelibrary.com</t> ]
Custom Designed Tms Filter Box, supplied by Magstim Company, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/custom+designed+tms+filter+box/pmc06221049-78-18-26?v=Magstim+Company
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom designed tms filter box - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


(a) Location of facial markers and TMS targets in the neural navigator. The statistical map of voluntarily‐induced motor activity is thresholded and shown in red. Facial markers: Tip of the nose; nasion, left and right inner eyelid; left and right upper and lower ear. TMS targets: Primary motor cortex (M1); dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). (b) TMS coil probes. The probes are visualized in a T2‐weighted scan to determine their location with respect to the head. (c) Participant is lying on the MR bed with the head positioned in between two MR receive coils and the TMS coil located over the cranium [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Journal: Human Brain Mapping

Article Title: A novel concurrent TMS‐fMRI method to reveal propagation patterns of prefrontal magnetic brain stimulation

doi: 10.1002/hbm.24307

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Location of facial markers and TMS targets in the neural navigator. The statistical map of voluntarily‐induced motor activity is thresholded and shown in red. Facial markers: Tip of the nose; nasion, left and right inner eyelid; left and right upper and lower ear. TMS targets: Primary motor cortex (M1); dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). (b) TMS coil probes. The probes are visualized in a T2‐weighted scan to determine their location with respect to the head. (c) Participant is lying on the MR bed with the head positioned in between two MR receive coils and the TMS coil located over the cranium [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Article Snippet: Both experiments were done using a biphasic Magstim Rapid 2 magnetic stimulator, an MR‐compatible TMS coil and a custom designed TMS filter box (all manufactured by Magstim Inc., Whitland, The United Kingdom, http://www.magstim.com ; De Weijer et al., ; Mandija, Petrov, Neggers, Luijten, & Berg, ).

Techniques: Activity Assay

(a) Activity in the primary motor cortex in response to voluntary thumb movements (in red) and the location of the TMS coil isocenter during the TMS‐fMRI session is shown (in blue). (b) Activity in response to voluntary thumb movements contrasted with baseline activity ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (c) TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with baseline activity ( p < .05, FWE corrected). The same slices are shown as in (b) [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Journal: Human Brain Mapping

Article Title: A novel concurrent TMS‐fMRI method to reveal propagation patterns of prefrontal magnetic brain stimulation

doi: 10.1002/hbm.24307

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Activity in the primary motor cortex in response to voluntary thumb movements (in red) and the location of the TMS coil isocenter during the TMS‐fMRI session is shown (in blue). (b) Activity in response to voluntary thumb movements contrasted with baseline activity ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (c) TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with baseline activity ( p < .05, FWE corrected). The same slices are shown as in (b) [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Article Snippet: Both experiments were done using a biphasic Magstim Rapid 2 magnetic stimulator, an MR‐compatible TMS coil and a custom designed TMS filter box (all manufactured by Magstim Inc., Whitland, The United Kingdom, http://www.magstim.com ; De Weijer et al., ; Mandija, Petrov, Neggers, Luijten, & Berg, ).

Techniques: Activity Assay

(a) TMS targets projected onto individual brain surfaces. The numbers refer to the participant numbers in Table . The red dot indicates the location of the hand area in the primary motor cortex (M1) as determined through fMRI. (b) The normalized COG of each individual TMS target projected onto an MNI brain. The TMS targets are based on initial TMS coil placement (as determined through a T2‐weighted scan) and corrected for subsequent head movement during image acquisition (as determined through realignment of the EPI volumes). Corresponding colors are used in (a) and (b) and Table [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Journal: Human Brain Mapping

Article Title: A novel concurrent TMS‐fMRI method to reveal propagation patterns of prefrontal magnetic brain stimulation

doi: 10.1002/hbm.24307

Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) TMS targets projected onto individual brain surfaces. The numbers refer to the participant numbers in Table . The red dot indicates the location of the hand area in the primary motor cortex (M1) as determined through fMRI. (b) The normalized COG of each individual TMS target projected onto an MNI brain. The TMS targets are based on initial TMS coil placement (as determined through a T2‐weighted scan) and corrected for subsequent head movement during image acquisition (as determined through realignment of the EPI volumes). Corresponding colors are used in (a) and (b) and Table [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Article Snippet: Both experiments were done using a biphasic Magstim Rapid 2 magnetic stimulator, an MR‐compatible TMS coil and a custom designed TMS filter box (all manufactured by Magstim Inc., Whitland, The United Kingdom, http://www.magstim.com ; De Weijer et al., ; Mandija, Petrov, Neggers, Luijten, & Berg, ).

Techniques:

TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (a)–(i) show TMS‐induced activity of Participants 1, 2, and 4–10 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Journal: Human Brain Mapping

Article Title: A novel concurrent TMS‐fMRI method to reveal propagation patterns of prefrontal magnetic brain stimulation

doi: 10.1002/hbm.24307

Figure Lengend Snippet: TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (a)–(i) show TMS‐induced activity of Participants 1, 2, and 4–10 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Article Snippet: Both experiments were done using a biphasic Magstim Rapid 2 magnetic stimulator, an MR‐compatible TMS coil and a custom designed TMS filter box (all manufactured by Magstim Inc., Whitland, The United Kingdom, http://www.magstim.com ; De Weijer et al., ; Mandija, Petrov, Neggers, Luijten, & Berg, ).

Techniques: Activity Assay

TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (a) and (b) show TMS‐induced activity in two different participants in which the TMS target was very similar. Left is left. (a) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 9. (b) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 10 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Journal: Human Brain Mapping

Article Title: A novel concurrent TMS‐fMRI method to reveal propagation patterns of prefrontal magnetic brain stimulation

doi: 10.1002/hbm.24307

Figure Lengend Snippet: TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Axial slices of an MNI brain are shown (left = left). (a) and (b) show TMS‐induced activity in two different participants in which the TMS target was very similar. Left is left. (a) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 9. (b) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 10 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Article Snippet: Both experiments were done using a biphasic Magstim Rapid 2 magnetic stimulator, an MR‐compatible TMS coil and a custom designed TMS filter box (all manufactured by Magstim Inc., Whitland, The United Kingdom, http://www.magstim.com ; De Weijer et al., ; Mandija, Petrov, Neggers, Luijten, & Berg, ).

Techniques: Activity Assay

TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Sagittal slices of an MNI brain are shown (first slice = left side; last slice = right side). (a) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 5. (b) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 7. (c) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 8. (d) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 9 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Journal: Human Brain Mapping

Article Title: A novel concurrent TMS‐fMRI method to reveal propagation patterns of prefrontal magnetic brain stimulation

doi: 10.1002/hbm.24307

Figure Lengend Snippet: TMS‐induced activity in response to TMS pulses of 115% RMT contrasted with TMS pulses of 60% RMT ( p < .05, FWE corrected). Sagittal slices of an MNI brain are shown (first slice = left side; last slice = right side). (a) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 5. (b) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 7. (c) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 8. (d) TMS‐induced activity of Participant 9 [Color figure can be viewed at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com ]

Article Snippet: Both experiments were done using a biphasic Magstim Rapid 2 magnetic stimulator, an MR‐compatible TMS coil and a custom designed TMS filter box (all manufactured by Magstim Inc., Whitland, The United Kingdom, http://www.magstim.com ; De Weijer et al., ; Mandija, Petrov, Neggers, Luijten, & Berg, ).

Techniques: Activity Assay